Eventually, consider wheelbases, which are 2700 mm / 106 in. vs. 2710 mm / 107 in. for Ford Kuga and Ford Focus respectively. We want to compare the engine specs of the models.Regarding speeding, Ford Kuga goes from 0 to 60 miles per hour for 8.8 sec while Ford Focus takes 11 sec . Ford Kuga will reach a speed of 207 km/h / 129 mph, compared to Side View Ford Kuga (DM2) SUV 2012 vs. Nissan Qashqai (J11) SUV 2013. Technical specs | Ford Kuga (DM2) SUV 2012 is 15.4 cm longer and 10.7 cm higher compared to Nissan Qashqai (J11) SUV 2013. It has 2.1 cm more ground clearance and offers 5% more cargo space. 4,5. 452.4 cm. +15.4. There was a period when Ford produced quite a few Kuga vehicles. But Subaru with its Forester, also guarantees great options and takes a lead in some factors. Buyers often consider the height and width for start. Looking at wheelbase, Subaru Forester has 2710 mm / 107 in. while Ford Kuga has got 2670 mm / 105 in. of base length. Ford Kuga 2.5 PHEV ST-Line specification. Where Surrey, UK Price £35,195 On sale Now Engine 4 cyls, 2488cc, petrol, plus electric motor Power 222bhp (combined) Torque Not specified Gearbox CVT 4 reasons to buy the Ford Tourneo Connect. 1. More engine capacity. 2 cc bigger engine displacement. The greater the engine capacity, the lower the wear and tear. Larger engine capacities provide longer vehicle lifespans. 1497 cc / 1.5 L 1499 cc / 1.5 L. 2. Side View Ford Kuga (DFK) SUV 2019 vs. Toyota C-HR (X10) SUV 2016 Technical specs | Ford Kuga (DFK) SUV 2019 is 10 in longer and 3.78 in higher compared to Toyota C-HR (X10) SUV 2016. It has 1.4 in more ground clearance and offers 33% more cargo space. 4,5 • Best people carriers and MPVs. Unlike the five-seat C-MAX, which is available with an entry-level 1.6-litre petrol engine, Grand C-MAX buyers are limited to EcoBost petrol and TDCi diesel units. Ford Galaxy vs Ford Kuga Compare price, expert/user reviews, mpg, engines, safety, cargo capacity and other specs at a glance. Ford Galaxy vs Ford Kuga. Change. 2023 Ford Galaxy 2.5 Titanium. Side View Ford Kuga (DFK) SUV 2019 vs. Hyundai Tucson (NX4E) SUV 2020. Technical specs | Ford Kuga (DFK) SUV 2019 is 11.4 cm longer and 1.1 cm higher compared to Hyundai Tucson (NX4E) SUV 2020. It has 2.1 cm more ground clearance and offers 13% less cargo space. 4,5. 461.4 cm. +11.4. Length. How long is this vehicle, 2020 Ford Kuga SUV? 4614 mm 181.65 in. How wide is the vehicle, 2020 Ford Kuga SUV? 1883 mm 74.13 in. What is the curb weight, 2020 Ford Kuga III 2.5 Duratec (190 Hp) FHEV i-AWD CVT? 1698 kg 3743.45 lbs. What is the gross weight, 2020 Ford Kuga III 2.5 Duratec (190 Hp) FHEV i-AWD CVT? 2280 kg 5026.54 lbs. Hdeaf. Overview Bike Forum Chat Forum Members Forum Forum Help This topic has 31 replies, 22 voices, and was last updated 5 years ago by thisisnotaspoon. Viewing 32 posts - 1 through 32 (of 32 total) Kuga v Cmax v Grand Cmax – help me decide New car time and looking for either hands on experience or informed enlightenment. I have a 10 year old Mondeo and whilst it’s a nice car to drive and has good gadgets I’ve never really got on with it over 8 years of owning it, like I did with the Focus I had before it. I think I’ve narrowed down my lack of like for it to its size. I find it too long. I have to park on side streets near work and I don’t think that’s helping much so I’m wanting to get a smaller car this time around, but I have a family to fit in. Kids are 6 and 8, and as I intend to keep this car for another 6-8 years again this car needs to fit teenagers in at some point. It needs to have a big enough boot for stuff we use at the moment like bikes etc. Anyone got any nuggets of advice? Anyone got any of these and have a similar scenario to me? How do you find them etc etc? Posted 5 years ago Despised our CMAX, worst car I’ve ever owned and was glad to be rid of it though we had loads of trouble with the engine. Size wise it was adequate for me, my wife and our two boys at the time along with their bikes in the ample boot. A more modern version would no doubt be a worthy purchase and it wasn’t overly big either, same footprint as a focus if I remember correctly?? Posted 5 years ago We find the C-max big enough for our needs – family of four, camping trips to France with bikes etc. We use a roof box and a towbar rack as needed. It’s no harder to park than a Focus but is bigger inside. You could look at the Focus estate as well. I drove it to the Alps overnight a couple of years back and it was absolutely fine. Posted 5 years ago How do you find the Cmax in the back for the kids? Knee room ok? Our neighbours had a focus and said the legroom in the back was not enough for their 8 year old so changed it for a Mazda 6. Posted 5 years ago Advertisements We have a petrol Grand Cmax. It’s slow to accelerate but once it’s going is great . Loads of usable space and is shorter than a mondeo which we previously had. Great rear leg room (at least a foot)though I did take out the third row of seats so we could have a spare wheel. Love the sliding doors. Our next car will be another one. Posted 5 years ago We had a 53 regarding CMAX, it was OK, nice place to be but the air con died and the petrol was a thirsty beast. We had a look at the new ones over the summer and thought the space was good, but the interior was a bit low rent. Brand new ones might be better though Posted 5 years ago How do you find the Cmax in the back for the kids? Knee room ok? I’ve sat in the back and it seems ok. Having said that, I’m not tall so it might be a squeeze if the front seats are pushed right back. The rear seats do slide back but that eats into boot space so I don’t tend to bother – my kids are too young for it to be an issue anyway. One thing that I like – the individually removeable rear seats mean I can carry the two kids and fit my bike between them (with the wheels off). Posted 5 years ago Wife’s 08 plate CMax was worst car we’ve had, even more unreliable than the Scenic it replaced. Bought ex-demo nearly new and we sold it when the warranty ran out. petrol and it averaged 24mpg over the 30k miles. Many many parts were replaced under warranty and it broke down a few times. Replaced with a Soul which has been better in every way. Not much boot space so for the OP question, I’d be looking at Kia/Hyundai options with 5/7 year warranty Posted 5 years ago 24mpg!!!! Our LWB T5 converted van gets 34mpg. We’ve just changed from a Focus estate which averaged 53mpg over 6 years (mileage against actual fuel use). Posted 5 years ago On my second cmax both from new. First was a 61 plate petrol. Was nice but lacked a bit of acceleration did about 28k in two years but turned it over for another 63 plate diesel which has a lot more acceleration. I get 48mpg out of it according to the trip computer which I’ve checked. I’m on 40k in three years on this car. I have two teenagers and regularly head off camping and carry 4 bikes on a tow bar rack. I usually use a roof box when camping. It all fits in along with the four of us who are all adult sized with wriggle room. I regularly stick two bikes in the boot (with all seats in but two lifted) in order to go riding with my son. It will fit a single bike in the boot with all seats up. Funnily enough I’ve been thinking about what I would replace it with and come up with …… well, if I was desperate to change model then a Focus estate, and if I really didn’t want to go Ford again then maybe a civic estate? I did want a Kuga but they were tiny inside and a grand cmax was just too much of a franken car to my eyes 🙂 Posted 5 years ago Have you considered the B-Max? It’s Fiesta based, instead of Focus, it’s neatest feature are the sliding rear doors, which allow better access to the rear seats, along with a big rear hatch. I’ve driven two so far, and they were really fun to drive, had heated screens and various other nice bits and bobs. Nice driving position and great on twisty roads. I’ll be driving a Grand C-Max tomorrow, so it’ll be interesting to do a bit of a comparison, although the B-Max was a 13-plate and the C-Max is a 16-plate. Posted 5 years ago Just bought a 14 plate cmax (non grand) From 2010 onwards is the current shape, and this year they did a facelift but essentially same I think I would agree the interior is not quite vw feel, go for the titanium for better stereo and gadgets. The basic zetec spec is not that great. Not sure about the kuga, just don’t want an SUV at all so I didn’t look at it. I expect it’s not as roomy as the cmax though Also worth looking at the touran but expect to pay £5k more. I much preferred the drive of the cmax over the touran which feels more bus like, because it is! So far I’m enjoying the cmax. I’ve got the ecoboost which is surprisingly nippy. Mpg is a bit disappointing, best I’m getting is about 35 around town and 45 on motorway so nowhere near the claimed figures. Otherwise it’s a great car, fingers crossed it’ll i won’t need the warranty! Posted 5 years ago Good to see there are some good things regarding the Cmax and space etc. I can’t see me ever needing to pack camping stuff as my wife hates it. Caravans might be different but camping is a no go. Hopefully the boot will be big enough for all our stuff. I’ve had 3 Ford’s and so has my wife so I’m fully aware the quality isn’t perfect but it’s good enough for us I think. Titanium spec might be a good option though. Posted 5 years ago Kuga is way smaller inside and in the boot than the size of the car seems to be… seats felt quite stiff/firm and not as plush as the Mondeos. Posted 5 years ago I quite like my wife’s 57 plate cmax four our family of 4 + dog. petrol is quite thirsty and costs a fortune to tax but so far it has been reliable, and we’ll keep it ’til it dies I think. We have to park in the street and the small size is a bonus. I’ve got a 99 VW T4 and the cmax is a pleasure to drive compared to that! Posted 5 years ago How tall are your kids? The leg room in the back of the Kuga is not great. Also, the mk1 has a narrow boot entry so it’s had to get wide things into it. It’s a great 2-person car, not so sure for a family. Posted 5 years ago Similar thought processes resulted in me getting a Yeti which I am very happy with. Posted 5 years ago we have a 60 plate C-Max zetec we’ve had it for 3 years and its been good so far. economy wise the best i’ve managed out of it is about 39mpg…if its driven enthusiastically then that drops down to about 35mppg its not the highest spec…rear windows are manual..no cruise control or bluetooth…but its does us just fine drives like a car and doesnt feel mpv-ish even though the seating position is higher than a normal car as for boot space…thats quite big and the access to it is very good…low lip on the sill, which is wide enough to sit on too. the only issue i have with it is getting the bike in the back…small/med frame size with 26″ wheels the rear seats are a funny design…you have to fold the backs of the seats down and then lift the whole seat forward and then use the bungees to secure it to the front seat…with the seats in that position you loose about 18″ of boot space…you can of course take the whole seat out if you have somewhere to store them but as it is the only way the bike fits in the boot is upside down, with the wheels off and with the seats folded ours is in panther black with the privacy glass which makes it look pretty cool…but just be aware that reverse parking on very dark nights or in poorly lit areas can be a bit of a pain Posted 5 years ago mudshark – Member Similar thought processes resulted in me getting a Yeti which I am very happy with. I’ve been down that route but only the Ford’s have the quickclear front screen which is amazing. Posted 5 years ago I recently bought a 2015 Cmax Easy. Diesel. So far so good. My stepdaughter is 16 and 5′ 10″ and has no complaint on back seat space. She complains about many things constantly but nothing about the car so I imagine she’s happy there. Plenty spacious for 4 of us going away for a weekend. I love the park assist as I’m a bloody hopeless parker and in Vienna it’s amazing parking on the street. I didn’t buy air pressure sensors for my winter wheels so the dash has an error message saying I’ve got 4 flat wheels but I can live with that. I was rear ended but a young girl. Her car just crumbled whereas the Cmax was hardly damaged at all. Posted 5 years ago That’s what’s supposed to happen. Posted 5 years ago You see a lot of CMax and BMax and come to that SMax’s around my way. Theres a massive Ford dealership near Portsmouth that knocks em’ out, always a sale or event going on throughout the year. I’d suggest you look at those large independent dealerships too, my 5 mins looking around a couple down here revealed vehicles ex-demo or with <7k on the clock can be had for £6-7k off list.. Bargain. Posted 5 years ago CountZero – would be nice to hear what your thoughts after driving the Grand Cmax are…. Posted 5 years ago We’ve had a grand cmax for about two years now and love it. I’ve got two tall boys, 5 and 9, and I’m 6 foot. With the rear seats right back there’s plenty of room in the back even with me driving, boot is good too. Used the extra seats a reasonable amount with taking kids and friends to places etc, can fit adults in too but you wouldn’t want to spend too long on them as they are quite small. Bootspace wise, it’s very tall, a little narrower than our previous 55 focus. We got the cargo net with it which give loads of extra room as you can ram it to roof. We do a lot of camping and it’s been great. Main thing for us is that the boys have a lot of space so very happy on long journeys. Sliding rear doors are amazing, no longer worry about narrow parking spaces as can always get the kids out. We got a titanium spec model as it just had the extras we wanted. Stereo is really good too. Down sides, boot isn’t as big as you might expect, especially when compared to bigger smax and virtually non existent with rear seats up. You do lose quite a bit for those rear seats and they cannot be taken is low compared to what you might expect as it’s a heavy car. We have the 2l diesel and average about 45mpg. But it pulls very well and doesn’t seem to notice when loaded with camping gear, roof box and bikes. All in all, we think it’s the best family car we’ve had and would get another one happily. Posted 5 years ago Ive a c-max (06 plate) Its big enough, but the rear seats dont fold flat so the boot isnt actually that big in terms of getting bikes in which is a PITA. So I have a towbar and a bike rack. Rear legroom is huge, as is headroom. And the outer 2 seats slide back too if you want full on lime levels of legroom. And my grandparents love it as the seats are taller/upright so getting in isnt a contortion for people 6ft tall with hip replacements (or just cold mountainbikers trying to get bikes and bodies in the back). Its the older (non turbo, non vct) petrol, dash is cuttently showing 44mpg (mostly motorway at an indicated 70). Drops to mid 30’s for commuting/town use. The petrol is a lot thirstier and barely more peowerfull in real life as its a small version of the bigger duratec engine (the is/was the biggest itteration of the smaller sigma engine). Reliability wise, the only failure was a power steering hose fixed under warrenty. And Ive serviced it on my driveway for the past 60,000 miles apart from the cambelt. So all its cost me is tyres and the cabelt service which is pretty good going for a 10 year old car! Posted 5 years ago I have a MkI Kuga Titanium AWD and I really like it. Boot isn’t as big as a Mondeo’s but then again how many cars are? Plenty of rear legroom IMO and with one front seat passenger I can get a 6piece drum kit, two bags of stands, cymbals, a Marshall 4×12 cab & separate head and two or three guitars in it. Tailgate is plenty wide enough and has the advantage of split tailgate for smaller loads or restricted space. It’s showing on mostly twisty country lanes with a bit of urban mileage thrown in. Front wheel drive most of the time but the rear wheels kick in automatically when (if) the front wheels start to spin. Handy on occasional snow between Otley & Ripon. Makes not a jot of difference to braking on ice or snow Posted 5 years ago Kuga has pretty large exterior dimensions. Quite a nice place to be. Quick in a straight line but wallowy in corners is apparently the sporty bit of Suv. The boot lip is flat, so the utility bit of sUv is covered and it’s definitely a vehicle. Fortunately it was a company car, if it were my money I wouldn’t. From the list it’s the best of a bad bunch. Posted 5 years ago Agreed it’s a big car but most of the bigness is in the height – about same length & width as the Focus it’s based on but I’m 5’8″ and I can just about see over the roof Posted 5 years ago Agreed it’s a big car but most of the bigness is in the height – about same length & width as the Focus it’s based on but I’m 5’8″ and I can just about see over the roof Not a chance, unless the Ford page proves me wrong, I’ll say the Focus I was driving before the Kuga fitted in parking spaces (Charles St Manchester) where the Kuga wouldn’t. Even the C-max is a touch shorter and I also imagine narrower. Posted 5 years ago I don’t know Manchester but I have no problem parking it in Bradford or Leeds. Certainly shorter than the 320d Touring and 9-3 Sportwagon I’ve had before it, my drive tells me so as there’s now a wheelie bin behind it & it still fits Posted 5 years ago We bought our 14 plate C-max auto Titanium over 18 months ago to replace the 57 plate 2-zetec auto we`d had for 5 years The differnce is staggering the old petrol turned tops on a run ,the new one does close to 40 round town and ive seen returns of over 55mpg on good motorway runs over the uk limit 🙂 And it doesnt hang about , big enough for the 2+2 family and all the mod cons , sensors all over the shop ,electric everything , and when the boss isnt using it easy to chuck 3 bikes in the back with wheels off and 3 packs , we did look at the Kuga and glad we turned it down as a friend bought the fame spec as ours and struggles to get 32 around town and tops out at 45 on a run Posted 5 years ago Pretty sure the original c-max is based on the same floorpan as the mk2 focus estate (or the mk2 focus is on a c-max if you treat it chronologically). So it should be the same size. Not sure if it’s entirely right but the mk2 focus estate was smaller than the mk1, and my c-max boot isnt as big as my parents old mk1 focus estate. It is however undeniably taller. Doesnt stop me being a bit entusiastic on b-roads, its not a focus RS, but its a long way from rolling arround like a berlingo or “drives just like a car” T5. Posted 5 years ago Viewing 32 posts - 1 through 32 (of 32 total) The topic ‘Kuga v Cmax v Grand Cmax – help me decide’ is closed to new replies. Thanks for popping by - why not stay a while?IT'S FREESign up as a Singletrack Member and you can leave comments on stories, use the classified ads, and post in our forums, do quizzes and us, join in, it’s free, and fun. Bringing car spotting into perspective Real height1 m 2 1 m Real height1 + 6 cm + cm 1 m Real length Click/tap cars to swap positions Street perspective vs. specification. See Disclaimer. Side ViewFord Kuga (DFK) SUV 2019 vs. Ford C-Max (DM2) Minivan 2003 Technical specs | Ford Kuga (DFK) SUV 2019 is cm longer and 6 cm higher compared to Ford C-Max (DM2) Minivan 2003. It offers 6% less cargo 1. Maximum height | 2. Width with folded mirrors | 3. Max. ground clearance | 4. Most common power unit. Possible deviation of standards. | 5. With rear seats folded down Quick Facts 721801 Comparison combinations Germany Origin of the most car models 1908 Year of our oldest car model Used Ford KugaLaunched in 2012, the Ford Kuga's good looks, refined driving experience and overall practicality have made it very popular indeed. Used Ford Kuga's tend to be economical and pretty inexpensive to run, and so popular for budget-conscious families in the market for an SUV. Owners and reviews alike have commented on the Kuga's driving experience – it's an SUV that handles like a hatchback and offers one of the best drives in this Ford Kuga cars in stock£6,995£8,995£2,490£15,500£6,000Owner ReviewsGood pointsGood size, comfortable and like the height of the...Bad pointsWas dissapointed there was no sav nav built in...Good pointsTouch screen excellent. Reclining sears in back...Bad pointsElectric mirrors don't come as standard on a...SIMONPublished 2019-04-23Good pointsEasy to access & good visual points. Excellent...Bad pointsPedals high so long journeys can make you ache a...Related articlesFord Kuga SUV (2019 - ) reviewWith a plug-in hybrid option as well as the regular petrol and diesel options, the Ford Kuga adds affordable running costs to an already appealing proposition Expert review2 years agoFord Kuga SUV (2016 - 2019) reviewThe Ford Kuga is a compact SUV, and as such, competes in one of the most hard-fought sectors of the car market. With so many rivals, does it stand out?Expert review3 years agoComing soon: 2020 Ford KugaFord has completely overhauled the Kuga, its mid-size SUV. It’ll be available with a choice of petrol, diesel or hybrid years agoBest Car for City Driving: Ford KugaFind out why the Ford Kuga is the 2018 winner of our Best Car for City Drivers years agoFrequently asked questions Difference Between Ford Kuga 2017 Vs C Max Energi Se 2017Comparison Between Ford Kuga 2017 and C Max Energi Se 2017 by Technical specifications, safety features, chassis, dimensions, bodystyle, category, mileage, transmission, top speed, maximum power, maximum torque, country of origin, country of assembly, suspension system, braking system and more... Collapse all Expand all Click Here for Multiple Car Comparison Engine Description : Litre 16V Diesel Atkinson-Cycle I-4 Hybrid EngineEngine Type : liter CRDi and DOHC Diesel EngineHybrid EngineMaximum Power :150 bhp ( Exactly : 157 bhp [ 156 PS ]@ 3200 rpm )140 bhp ( Exactly:141 Bhp @ 6000 rpm )Maximum Torque :380 Nm ( Exactly : 385 Nm @ 2500 rpm )170 Nm ( Exactly: 179 Nm @ 4000 rpm )Displacement :2200 cc ( Exactly : 2198 cc )2000 ccNumber Of Cylinders :44Valves Of Total Cylinders :1616Bore X Stroke :96 x 102 mm-Top Speed :-180 kmph ( Exactly: Gas Engine Mode 185 Kph (115 Mph) Electric Engine mode 100 Kph (62 mph) )Acceleration :-0 to 100 Kmph / 7 SecondsCo2 Emission :--Transmission Type :6 Speed6 Speed AutomaticDrive Type :FWD (Front Wheel Drive)AWD (All Wheel Drive)Fuel Tank Capacity :70 ltrs ( Exactly : 71 ltrs [ gal ] )40 ltrs Length :5060 mm ( 199 in )-Width :1788 mm ( in )-Height :1826 mm ( in )-Wheelbase :2860 mm ( in )-Front Track :1475 mm ( 58 in )-Rear Track :1470 mm ( in )-Curb Weight :1930 kg ( lbs )-Turning Circle :--

ford kuga vs c max